-
Website
http://blacksmythe.com/blog -
Original page
http://blacksmythe.com/blog/2009/07/23/what-do-you-call-a-black-man-with-a-phd-in-america-pt-2/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
The notes on class are very important here & that is sad, however this is America.
On a softer note of racial profiling, 2 weeks ago, I was shopping on 5th Ave in NYC when I decided to stop in the Lacoste store for a shirt.
After browsing uninterrupted for a short bit, I spotted a shirt that I wanted, looked for my size & could not find it. Moments later a clerk came & asked if she could help me. I said sure, I need a XX, so she called to get one. Then I asked about another shirt & she called on that to.
As the shirts came, she said in an almost whispered voice, these are not on sale.
I pause, looked at the shirts, then looked at her & said AND? She backed off. I dropped the shirts then walked out pissed.
I know this happens all the time but when it happened to me, I was pissed off. I guess I still am.
Maybe it was my hair that made her think I was broke, maybe it was my dashiki or perhaps it was my cheap Old Navy jeans. I'm just saying.
That's why I only buy my clothes at Nordstrom's. The folks who work there would never say anything like that to a customer.
These were two awesome posts. I'm sorry that you and so many other people of color have to go through this nonsense.
NO need to doubt that the Gates incident it as international news, the BBC is discussing the Gates incident, that pretty much settles it.
http://worldhaveyoursay.wordpress.com/2009/07/2...
(should be interesting to listen to)
I'm wondering about your characterization of him as well , I guess uppity/talented tenthish mentality would be the way to term it. (The idea that people's lack of opportunities is their own fault part) . I have never read his work, just the African-American Lives series and from that I didn't detect that from him, granted he isn't the Malcolm or even Cornell West type but to each his own.
He has his reasons for not realizing/being outspoken about racial profiling before (it's sad, but it happens). But as afar as I can see, things don't change until they happen to people in power/people in power take interest in it. Until someone who can push for change's family, best friend/neighbor is affected by it (.e.g the Brady bill). At the end of the day, I don't care what makes him look at this issue, or rather I don't care because it stems from a personal experience, but I do care that it has brought some natural discussion about and that his documentary will do more of the same.
just my two cents
http://hnicwatch.blogspot.com/
With all due respect, I have to disagree with you on one point. "Because the entire concept of racial profiling is based on class–on the idea that black middle and upper class men are treated as if they are POOR and black." This point that you are making here (in my opinion) is not one hundred percent correct. In my experience, "racial profiling" has evolved with time. I believe it is now more correct to call it simply, "profiling". The reason for this shift is actually because of the social "class" that you refer to in your statement. In today’s society, and all the varied dynamics there in, race has gradually become less of an indicator, and thus less important. As a retired police officer it was my personal observation (in the location of my job) that the areas in which crimes were most likely to occur was of course in the more depressed areas of town. With that said I believe that you can agree that economic depression knows no race and therefore is neither biased nor racist. Anyway, in these areas you will find all races of people just as you will all across the land. I can of course only speak to the area in which I live and worked, but race was simply not a factor in determining who was suspect in any given crime. I suppose the point I am trying to get to is that a persons race is becoming less a factor in these matters. There will always be those instances where a particular officer will be the exception, but it is quickly becoming, not the rule. In today’s lawsuit happy society police officers have to be very careful in all that they do, because generally speaking they are usually guilty until proven innocent, and it is a well know fact that even the appearance of a racially motivated action can be a career ender.
One last point, I only worked for two different departments during my career, but in both of those departments it was against department policy to handcuff any suspect’s hands in front of their body for officer safety reasons. To violate this policy could and usually would result in time off without pay, regardless of the suspect. It is very easy to sit in judgment of police officers. The public in general wants to hold them to an all but impossible standard, always wanting to overlook the fact that they too are human. I would venture to guess that if more citizens were to go to their local police department and request to ride along with an officer for a week or two that they would walk away with a vastly different view of police officers. You know... walk a mile in their shoes.
I seriously doubt that Dr. Gates was placed in handcuffs and arrested because of his race. Oh and no, the police officer isn't necessarily always without fault, nor are they necessarily always right.
These are both class-inflected. And infected, I'd add.
From the standpoint of the police profiling is a different thing. After 9/11 it likely becomes much more complicated.
But, I am still not ok with this kind of treatment of anyone.
I have had one too many arguments with well meaning friends in the past seven or so months since a young man was shot in the back in Oakland because he mouthed off to a BART cop (read, not even a real police officer). I don't know that young man, but I don't need to know him personally to know that it is not ok to shoot a man in the back who you already have on the ground with his arms behind his back. Despite this, there are too many who would argue that he was "threatening." As though being black and young and a man is inherently threatening.
So, I think you are 100% right on. I am hoping that we have a better answer for the question posed as the title of this piece. I am hopeful and open every day.
Gates is not apolitical. I think he was reaching for his Mumia moment, and I think he's having to deal with the real fact of his ascent in society. That when he introduces himself as a distinguished tenured ivy league professor and the social currency that goes along with that, he gives up the right to be a stand-in for Pookie. Race simply isn't that flexible in today's society whether or not it is in Gates' head.
Today I discovered that the arresting officer, appropos your own personal story, is FACULTY and teaches the anti-racial profiling class to police. Has done so for five years. But very much like your story, once fear pulls the trigger, people feel entitled to take it to the ends of their immediate bias. Gates *felt threatened*.
There's all kinds of ways to spin this - that it obscures a bigger picture, that it represents a bigger picture. I see it two ways.
#1. Gates is no hero, and the system provided him no platform to speak as a victim of injustice. There is no injustice here.
#2. The court of public opinion is highly manipulated, and easily spins against justice.
It seems to me that the more people try to make of this, the less justice is possible.